Wednesday, May 23, 2012

News Feed Comments
You are here: Home / CCTV Cameras / Is it reasonable to reduce the no.of law enforcers in favor of providing more CCTV cameras to solve crimes?

Is it reasonable to reduce the no.of law enforcers in favor of providing more CCTV cameras to solve crimes?

October 22, 2009 by admin  
Filed under CCTV Cameras

4 Comments

CCTV is proven yet of being effective / efficient to accumulate evidence of a certain crime.

I wholeheartedly support this proposition.

CCTV provides evidence, and is not capable of setting-up an innocent person the way unscrupulous "law enforcers" do. CCTV also will never ask for kotong or bribe money.

Tags:

Comments

4 Responses to “Is it reasonable to reduce the no.of law enforcers in favor of providing more CCTV cameras to solve crimes?”
  1. fireFox says:
    October 22, 2009 at 4:30 am

    Yes I agree, but the civil rights movement will always have something to say about surveillance cameras and videos.
    References :

  2. ThinkTank™ says:
    October 22, 2009 at 5:19 am

    No. A CCTV is a just an onlooker. It can’t catch a criminal. To maintain a CCTV all around the city is even costlier than hiring policemen to be stationed in every streets.

    Actually law enforcers are not enough. The Pinoys just need not a corrupt leader.
    References :

  3. BIG MOUTH MOTOR MOUTH -YEHEY- says:
    October 22, 2009 at 5:53 am

    LOLS—-YEAH, THE CCTV CAMERA WILL UN-WIRE ITSELF AND CHASE AFTER THE SUSPECTS WHEN ALING CORNYKANG ASK FOR HELP !!!!
    References :

  4. @wrestler@ says:
    October 22, 2009 at 6:00 am

    I wholeheartedly support this proposition.

    CCTV provides evidence, and is not capable of setting-up an innocent person the way unscrupulous "law enforcers" do. CCTV also will never ask for kotong or bribe money.
    References :

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.